Baggers restaurant, Nuremberg

At this futuristic eatery, the wait staff is a thing of the past. Guests place their orders via a touch-screen computer at each table. When the food is ready, it zips to the table along a twisting track from the kitchen above directly to the guests at their tables. Dishes are covered and strapped well onto the trays so that they don’t go flying across.

This restaurant ________.

A380 In-flight Kitchen, Taipei

If you just can’t get enough of eating on planes but you’re sick of going through security and paying expensive airfare to do it, you may want to visit the A380 In-Flight Kitchen in Taipei. The restaurant resembles the inside of a plane, with oval-shaped windows, baggage compartments, and speckled blue seats complete with headrests. Waitresses dress like air hostesses, and “passengers” have much more than just chicken or fish to choose from.

This restaurant ________.

The Grey Plume, Omaha

Not only does the restaurant feature a menu full of seasonal, locally-grown produce and meats and dairy products delivered directly from local farms; it has also included highly efficient appliances, solar-powered hand sinks, LED lighting, recycling and composting programmes, non-toxic cleaning materials and eco-friendly products. All the wood used to build the Grey Plume is FSC-certified, and many of the other materials were recycled.

This restaurant ________.

Acorn House, London

Acorn House seasonal food is located in the Shoreditch area of the city. The restaurant composts and recycles all of its waste, buys only organic and fair trade food products as well as seasonal foods, uses boxes that can be sent back to suppliers, and picks up produce in its biodiesel car. Acorn House also boasts a training programme that prepares local youths to become sustainability-minded chefs.

This restaurant ________.

Unusual Restaurants

Dans Le Noir, London

It’s a novel concept where diners are served meals in complete darkness. Visitors must rely on their server for everything. Guests are guided to the table by the waiters armed with night view binoculars. Then the waiters take customers’ dietary preferences, and after that the idea is to lose all control over one’s meal and give oneself over to just experiencing it. This concept restaurant currently has branches in nine cities around the world.

This restaurant ________.

Give Me Your Undivided Attention

As I was wandering the campus on Sunday, I saw an unusual number of couples walking hand in hand where one of the pair was simultaneously talking on a cell phone. Strangest of all was a couple who were both talking on their phones. It’s possible that they were talking to each other, but I doubt it. It seems a shame to waste an idyllic walk with one’s significant other by talking to someone else on the phone.

It’s not at all uncommon to see parents talking on the phone while pushing a stroller. Being ignored by one’s parents builds a child’s character and independence, but again it seems like a missed opportunity for a bit of togetherness. It’s just payback when teenagers don’t want to be seen with their parents, a phenomenon you can observe in family groups where a bored teen chats on the phone while the elders point out the campus sights.

But cell phones seem to encourage us to do too many things at the same time. Last spring, I saw a guy riding a bike, and holding his dog’s leash with one hand while talking on his phone with the other. The dog seemed quite happy. I wonder what would happen if the dog decided to chase a squirrel, or the bike ran into one of the giant potholes that had opened up over the winter, or a cell-phoning parent and stroller suddenly came out of nowhere.

Professors Sam Wang and Alan Gelperin gave a talk about Neuroscience and Everyday Life. One of their topics was experimental results that show that multitasking is not as efficient as doing tasks sequentially – overall performance suffers when we try to do two things at the same time. At lectures the problem is the distracting effect of texting, tweeting and checking Facebook while the person at the front of the room is trying to explain something. There’s little doubt that people who play with their phones and computers while sometimes tuning in to the lecture do not learn as well as those who focus.

Another study showed that driving while distracted is a major cause of auto accidents; cell-phone use, especially texting, is implicated in a quarter to a third of all fatalities. One doesn’t have to drive far on a typical interstate to see someone weaving between lanes, or drifting onto the shoulder, or slowing down dangerously because they’re looking down at a phone. Of course, there are plenty of other driving distractions, like eating, reading, shaving, putting on makeup, fiddling with the GPS, and holding animated conversations with passengers. But texting seems to be the equivalent of being well over the legal limit for alcohol.

In ancient cars like mine, the controls are buttons and knobs of various sizes and shapes, which can be manipulated by feel. But the trend in new cars is toward interfaces that require looking at a touch screen to select items from a menu, just like a phone or a computer screen. You can’t operate such interfaces without taking your eyes off the road for considerable periods of time. At 75 miles per hour, a car travels 110 feet in one second, so if you poke around on a screen for three seconds trying to adjust the radio, you’ve covered the length of a football field without seeing what’s around you.

The author writes about the following driving distractions EXCEPT ________.

Give Me Your Undivided Attention

As I was wandering the campus on Sunday, I saw an unusual number of couples walking hand in hand where one of the pair was simultaneously talking on a cell phone. Strangest of all was a couple who were both talking on their phones. It’s possible that they were talking to each other, but I doubt it. It seems a shame to waste an idyllic walk with one’s significant other by talking to someone else on the phone.

It’s not at all uncommon to see parents talking on the phone while pushing a stroller. Being ignored by one’s parents builds a child’s character and independence, but again it seems like a missed opportunity for a bit of togetherness. It’s just payback when teenagers don’t want to be seen with their parents, a phenomenon you can observe in family groups where a bored teen chats on the phone while the elders point out the campus sights.

But cell phones seem to encourage us to do too many things at the same time. Last spring, I saw a guy riding a bike, and holding his dog’s leash with one hand while talking on his phone with the other. The dog seemed quite happy. I wonder what would happen if the dog decided to chase a squirrel, or the bike ran into one of the giant potholes that had opened up over the winter, or a cell-phoning parent and stroller suddenly came out of nowhere.

Professors Sam Wang and Alan Gelperin gave a talk about Neuroscience and Everyday Life. One of their topics was experimental results that show that multitasking is not as efficient as doing tasks sequentially – overall performance suffers when we try to do two things at the same time. At lectures the problem is the distracting effect of texting, tweeting and checking Facebook while the person at the front of the room is trying to explain something. There’s little doubt that people who play with their phones and computers while sometimes tuning in to the lecture do not learn as well as those who focus.

Another study showed that driving while distracted is a major cause of auto accidents; cell-phone use, especially texting, is implicated in a quarter to a third of all fatalities. One doesn’t have to drive far on a typical interstate to see someone weaving between lanes, or drifting onto the shoulder, or slowing down dangerously because they’re looking down at a phone. Of course, there are plenty of other driving distractions, like eating, reading, shaving, putting on makeup, fiddling with the GPS, and holding animated conversations with passengers. But texting seems to be the equivalent of being well over the legal limit for alcohol.

In ancient cars like mine, the controls are buttons and knobs of various sizes and shapes, which can be manipulated by feel. But the trend in new cars is toward interfaces that require looking at a touch screen to select items from a menu, just like a phone or a computer screen. You can’t operate such interfaces without taking your eyes off the road for considerable periods of time. At 75 miles per hour, a car travels 110 feet in one second, so if you poke around on a screen for three seconds trying to adjust the radio, you’ve covered the length of a football field without seeing what’s around you.

Which of the following is stated in the text?

Give Me Your Undivided Attention

As I was wandering the campus on Sunday, I saw an unusual number of couples walking hand in hand where one of the pair was simultaneously talking on a cell phone. Strangest of all was a couple who were both talking on their phones. It’s possible that they were talking to each other, but I doubt it. It seems a shame to waste an idyllic walk with one’s significant other by talking to someone else on the phone.

It’s not at all uncommon to see parents talking on the phone while pushing a stroller. Being ignored by one’s parents builds a child’s character and independence, but again it seems like a missed opportunity for a bit of togetherness. It’s just payback when teenagers don’t want to be seen with their parents, a phenomenon you can observe in family groups where a bored teen chats on the phone while the elders point out the campus sights.

But cell phones seem to encourage us to do too many things at the same time. Last spring, I saw a guy riding a bike, and holding his dog’s leash with one hand while talking on his phone with the other. The dog seemed quite happy. I wonder what would happen if the dog decided to chase a squirrel, or the bike ran into one of the giant potholes that had opened up over the winter, or a cell-phoning parent and stroller suddenly came out of nowhere.

Professors Sam Wang and Alan Gelperin gave a talk about Neuroscience and Everyday Life. One of their topics was experimental results that show that multitasking is not as efficient as doing tasks sequentially – overall performance suffers when we try to do two things at the same time. At lectures the problem is the distracting effect of texting, tweeting and checking Facebook while the person at the front of the room is trying to explain something. There’s little doubt that people who play with their phones and computers while sometimes tuning in to the lecture do not learn as well as those who focus.

Another study showed that driving while distracted is a major cause of auto accidents; cell-phone use, especially texting, is implicated in a quarter to a third of all fatalities. One doesn’t have to drive far on a typical interstate to see someone weaving between lanes, or drifting onto the shoulder, or slowing down dangerously because they’re looking down at a phone. Of course, there are plenty of other driving distractions, like eating, reading, shaving, putting on makeup, fiddling with the GPS, and holding animated conversations with passengers. But texting seems to be the equivalent of being well over the legal limit for alcohol.

In ancient cars like mine, the controls are buttons and knobs of various sizes and shapes, which can be manipulated by feel. But the trend in new cars is toward interfaces that require looking at a touch screen to select items from a menu, just like a phone or a computer screen. You can’t operate such interfaces without taking your eyes off the road for considerable periods of time. At 75 miles per hour, a car travels 110 feet in one second, so if you poke around on a screen for three seconds trying to adjust the radio, you’ve covered the length of a football field without seeing what’s around you.

Why does the author mention the story with the dog?

Give Me Your Undivided Attention

As I was wandering the campus on Sunday, I saw an unusual number of couples walking hand in hand where one of the pair was simultaneously talking on a cell phone. Strangest of all was a couple who were both talking on their phones. It’s possible that they were talking to each other, but I doubt it. It seems a shame to waste an idyllic walk with one’s significant other by talking to someone else on the phone.

It’s not at all uncommon to see parents talking on the phone while pushing a stroller. Being ignored by one’s parents builds a child’s character and independence, but again it seems like a missed opportunity for a bit of togetherness. It’s just payback when teenagers don’t want to be seen with their parents, a phenomenon you can observe in family groups where a bored teen chats on the phone while the elders point out the campus sights.

But cell phones seem to encourage us to do too many things at the same time. Last spring, I saw a guy riding a bike, and holding his dog’s leash with one hand while talking on his phone with the other. The dog seemed quite happy. I wonder what would happen if the dog decided to chase a squirrel, or the bike ran into one of the giant potholes that had opened up over the winter, or a cell-phoning parent and stroller suddenly came out of nowhere.

Professors Sam Wang and Alan Gelperin gave a talk about Neuroscience and Everyday Life. One of their topics was experimental results that show that multitasking is not as efficient as doing tasks sequentially – overall performance suffers when we try to do two things at the same time. At lectures the problem is the distracting effect of texting, tweeting and checking Facebook while the person at the front of the room is trying to explain something. There’s little doubt that people who play with their phones and computers while sometimes tuning in to the lecture do not learn as well as those who focus.

Another study showed that driving while distracted is a major cause of auto accidents; cell-phone use, especially texting, is implicated in a quarter to a third of all fatalities. One doesn’t have to drive far on a typical interstate to see someone weaving between lanes, or drifting onto the shoulder, or slowing down dangerously because they’re looking down at a phone. Of course, there are plenty of other driving distractions, like eating, reading, shaving, putting on makeup, fiddling with the GPS, and holding animated conversations with passengers. But texting seems to be the equivalent of being well over the legal limit for alcohol.

In ancient cars like mine, the controls are buttons and knobs of various sizes and shapes, which can be manipulated by feel. But the trend in new cars is toward interfaces that require looking at a touch screen to select items from a menu, just like a phone or a computer screen. You can’t operate such interfaces without taking your eyes off the road for considerable periods of time. At 75 miles per hour, a car travels 110 feet in one second, so if you poke around on a screen for three seconds trying to adjust the radio, you’ve covered the length of a football field without seeing what’s around you.

What is the consequence of talking on the phone while walking with a baby?

Give Me Your Undivided Attention

As I was wandering the campus on Sunday, I saw an unusual number of couples walking hand in hand where one of the pair was simultaneously talking on a cell phone. Strangest of all was a couple who were both talking on their phones. It’s possible that they were talking to each other, but I doubt it. It seems a shame to waste an idyllic walk with one’s significant other by talking to someone else on the phone.

It’s not at all uncommon to see parents talking on the phone while pushing a stroller. Being ignored by one’s parents builds a child’s character and independence, but again it seems like a missed opportunity for a bit of togetherness. It’s just payback when teenagers don’t want to be seen with their parents, a phenomenon you can observe in family groups where a bored teen chats on the phone while the elders point out the campus sights.

But cell phones seem to encourage us to do too many things at the same time. Last spring, I saw a guy riding a bike, and holding his dog’s leash with one hand while talking on his phone with the other. The dog seemed quite happy. I wonder what would happen if the dog decided to chase a squirrel, or the bike ran into one of the giant potholes that had opened up over the winter, or a cell-phoning parent and stroller suddenly came out of nowhere.

Professors Sam Wang and Alan Gelperin gave a talk about Neuroscience and Everyday Life. One of their topics was experimental results that show that multitasking is not as efficient as doing tasks sequentially – overall performance suffers when we try to do two things at the same time. At lectures the problem is the distracting effect of texting, tweeting and checking Facebook while the person at the front of the room is trying to explain something. There’s little doubt that people who play with their phones and computers while sometimes tuning in to the lecture do not learn as well as those who focus.

Another study showed that driving while distracted is a major cause of auto accidents; cell-phone use, especially texting, is implicated in a quarter to a third of all fatalities. One doesn’t have to drive far on a typical interstate to see someone weaving between lanes, or drifting onto the shoulder, or slowing down dangerously because they’re looking down at a phone. Of course, there are plenty of other driving distractions, like eating, reading, shaving, putting on makeup, fiddling with the GPS, and holding animated conversations with passengers. But texting seems to be the equivalent of being well over the legal limit for alcohol.

In ancient cars like mine, the controls are buttons and knobs of various sizes and shapes, which can be manipulated by feel. But the trend in new cars is toward interfaces that require looking at a touch screen to select items from a menu, just like a phone or a computer screen. You can’t operate such interfaces without taking your eyes off the road for considerable periods of time. At 75 miles per hour, a car travels 110 feet in one second, so if you poke around on a screen for three seconds trying to adjust the radio, you’ve covered the length of a football field without seeing what’s around you.

What surprises the author most, according to PARAGRAPH 1?

This advertisement is for people who would like to ________.

This advertisement is for people who would like to ________.

This advertisement is for people who would like to ________.

This advertisement is for people who would like to ________.